This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

President Trump'southward move to loosen fuel economy standards will polarize the country: SUV and pickup fans versus hypermilers, climate-change doubters and deniers versus those worried about global warming, and spread-out middle America versus California and densely populated northeastern states. Information technology also pits America against most of the residue of the world that is trying to rein in fuel consumption and emissions.

In that location'due south as well a simpler caption: The administration is acknowledging America's honey affair with bigger vehicles that fire more fuel in a time of relatively cheap gasoline — slightly more costly than the historical average, but as much as a dollar a gallon less than much of the by decade.

"Cars That People Want and Can Afford"

In the past week, the Trump assistants, through EPA administrator Scott Pruitt, said fuel efficiency standards set past the Obama administration for 2022-2025 are "not appropriate." A coalition of Republican congressmen said in a statement,

If automakers cannot produce the cars people want to buy at prices they can afford, that will rapidly accept an agin touch on on the auto industry, its workers, and even the environment as older, less-efficient cars will remain on our roadways. That is why nosotros need reasonable and achievable improvements in fuel economy, and this determination is a footstep in the correct direction … [the Pruitt proposal] reflects current realities and meliorate mirrors what the car-buying public wants.

Pruitt likewise wants to roll back the exemption granted to California (also followed by 13 other states) that lets California ready stricter emissions rules to deal with pollution. Pruitt said,

Cooperative federalism doesn't mean that one state can dictate standards for the balance of the state. EPA will set up a national standard for greenhouse gas emissions that allows auto manufacturers to make cars that people both desire and can beget — while nevertheless expanding environmental and rubber benefits of newer cars. It is in America's best interest to have a national standard …

Wall Street Journal Headline, April 4, 2022

America'south Love Affair with Big Vehicles Continues

For all that's written nearly hybrids and battery electric vehicles as the cars of the time to come, culling fuel vehicles comprise only about 4 percent of new vehicles sales. And half of those are diesel engines, by and large in pickup trucks and large SUVs. Some of the BEVs and plug-in hybrids go to buyers whose love of efficient cars goes hand in hand with their desire to ride solo in HOV lanes in coastal cities.

In March, each of the peak six auto brands got at least half their volume from pickup trucks and SUVs: Fiat Chrysler got more than xc percent, Ford and GM got more than 75 percent, and Toyota, Nissan and Honda got more than 50 percent. In March, sales of the new Lincoln Navigator (5,900-half-dozen,200 pounds) were up 102 percent, and transaction prices increased past $26,000 thanks to Blackness Label and Reserve models costing equally much every bit $93,000. The Ford Expedition was also upwardly 46 percent, and the Cadillac Escalade was up 14 percent. In comparison, the Toyota Prius was down 19 percent. The Chevrolet Bolt EV, Chevrolet Volt, and Nissan Leaf each had fewer than 2,000 sales in March.

Electric current gas prices are only slightly higher than the historical boilerplate (dark-green line) and well below the $3.00-$three.50 a gallon of 2006-2014. Early 2022 prices have been $2.fifty-$2.65 a gallon. (Source: Section of Energy)

Rolling Back the MPG Standards

The current fuel efficiency targets would have light-duty vehicles — passenger cars, crossovers, SUVs, and pickup trucks — average 51.four mpg. That sounds high, and information technology is, considering it includes various credits that aren't tied to how much fuel is injected into the engine. In real-earth terms, the current standard means vehicles would have to achieve 36 real-world miles per gallon. The bodily number for 2025 efficiency hasn't been fix, but it will likely be lower than the 54.five mpg prepare by the Obama administration. The current administration describes a "lower trajectory" toward 2025. The electric current model-mix trajectory of the past year and a one-half puts automakers below 50 governmental mpg and beneath 35 real-world mpg.

Interestingly, people in California and New York/Massachusetts who decried "states' rights" — back when that meant keeping the government out of racial bigotry issues — now meet very conspicuously how sometimes, in their opinion, individual states do know better than the feds. There has been talks of legal action if California loses its power to gear up tougher standards to deal with its peculiar air pollution bug, primarily in the Los Angeles basin, ringed by mountains, where there are almost no mass transit options to plough to. Anyone who has menses into LAX now versus ten-25 years ago has seen a clear improvement in air quality, although SoCal has likewise done things such equally restrict ships in port from using their dirty engines to create shore power, along with widely ridiculed (if scientifically sound) restrictions on backyard mowers, leaf blowers, and even charcoal fires.

What Goes Effectually Comes Around

Automakers don't mind short-term rollbacks. They are less supportive of big-time, long-term rollbacks. They still accept to engineer and sell cars in the rest of the world, where the pressure level on reducing pollution increases every yr. Fifty-fifty if they can scale dorsum all other pollution, carbon dioxide (CO2) is a contributor to greenhouse gases, and it's emitted in straight proportion to how much fuel is burned. Europe is talking well-nigh banning or severely restricting diesel engines. Some cities are charging tariffs on combustion engine cars inbound the cities. (New York City is even talk virtually congestion pricing to reduce gridlock.) China'south megacities accept a huge need for EVs, and if U.s. and European companies don't engineer them, China will practise information technology on its own.

The automakers besides have their own demographers, and they know any rollback volition be short-term — significant years, not decades. They suspect it will not survive beyond 2022 if a Democrat wins the presidency. Longer-term, the demographics of the US are trending liberal, and in such numbers that it may be a permanent change.

A recent Pew Inquiry study broke Americans into four segments: Millennials (ages 22-37), Generation X (38-53), Baby Boomers (54-72), and Silents (and so-called because they grew up taught to be seen non heard, 73 and older). Among Millennials, 57 pct are consistently or mostly liberal, versus 19 per centum that are consistently or mostly conservative. In surveys taken in 1994, 2004, 2022 and 2022, the numbers leaning liberal have increased in each survey and inside each of the four historic period segments. The Silents that leaned conservative past 26-xvi perecent in 1994 have slipped to 29-28 percent bourgeois last year. Liberals in general believe global warming is real not faux news. They also back up higher fuel economy ratings, prefer diplomacy to military action, and believe black people have been held back by discrimination and not their own lack of initiative. Millennials are too moving to bigger cities, and take less interest in owning cars, or at least big cars.

So, whatever happens to economy and emissions standards, history and demographics say the bear upon will come and become over the grade of a couple years. In the meantime, bask cheap gas and large SUVs.